Skip to main content

The Philosopher’s Guide to Happiness



Mohan leaned against the parapet of my office terrace, the evening breeze tugging at his shirt. I handed him a mug of coffee I’d just made in my office, but he barely noticed, his thumb moving across his phone screen with fast typing. 

"I’m exhausted," he sighed, not looking up at the city skyline stretching out before us. "I have three dates lined up this week. One near Esplanade, one in Master Canteen, and another in Cuttack. I’m already dreading all of them."

"Then why are you going?" I asked, blowing on my steaming coffee.

"Because if I stop, I’m alone. And if I’m alone, I’m failing." He paused, finally looking at me. "I ghosted Priya, by the way."

I flinched. Priya was the graphic designer from Saheed Nagar he’d been seeing for a month. "Mohan, you can't just vanish. That’s awful."

"It’s not awful," he defended, the defensive posture of the modern dater kicking in. "I’m just doing me. I need to prioritize my own happiness. I’m exercising my freedom."

I took a sip of the coffee; strong, black, just how we liked it—and leaned in. "Mohan, you’re quoting the gospel of 'Self-Care,' but you’re missing the fine print. Freedom isn't a license to cause emotional wreckage just because you're bored or restless. It has boundaries. Remember John Stuart Mill from our college days?"

"The philosophy guy?"

"Yeah, him. He had this idea called the Harm Principle. Mill believed we should have absolute freedom to do whatever we want—up until the point where we harm someone else."

"I didn't harm her," Mohan scoffed. "I just didn't reply to her WhatsApp."

"You exercised power over her emotional state against her will," I countered gently. "You left her confused, anxious, and hurt because you were too cowardly to send a thirty-second text. Caring for the emotional wellbeing of your partner is non-negotiable. You can't inflict pain just because you need 'space.' In Mill’s world, your liberty to 'do you' ends exactly where Priya’s mental well-being begins. You aren't being free; you're just being a tyrant of the inbox."

Mohan slumped against the wall, staring at his screen. "Okay, fine. Point taken. But that doesn't fix the fact that I’m bored. I have fifty matches, and I feel nothing."

"That is because you are chasing what Mill called 'Lower Pleasures,'" I said, pointing at his phone with my mug. "He had a savage line for this exact feeling: 'It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.'"

"Are you calling me a pig?" Mohan asked, affronted.

"I’m saying you’re acting like one. Not you, but your strategy. Dating apps are designed to keep the 'pig' in us satisfied. They give us quick dopamine hits—matches, likes, superficial validation. It’s quantity over quality. But Mill argued that Higher Pleasures—intellectual connection, vulnerability, moral growth are the only things that actually sustain us."

"So I should just... be miserable?"

"No, you should be Socrates dissatisfied," I said. "You should be willing to be single and lonely—dissatisfied, rather than settling for shallow, swipe-based validation just to feel satisfied. You’re burnt out because you’re gorging on junk food and wondering why you aren't nourished."

A week later, Mohan called me. He sounded different. Calmer.

"I did something weird," he said. "I went on a date with that architect, Lipsa. We met at the Ekamra Kanan park. And instead of trying to impress her or follow the 'script,' I just... told the truth. I told her I’m burnt out. I told her I don’t know if I want to get married right away or just have a partner to explore Odisha with."

"And?"

"And we talked for four hours, walking all the way around the botanical gardens. She talked about how much she values her solo trekking trips to Koraput, and I realized I missed my own photography weekends. We agreed that a relationship shouldn't mean being glued together 24/7. It can be about giving each other space to pursue our own adventures while still coming back to share them. We realized that commitment is something you respect, not a cage you trap yourself in. It sounded crazy compared to the usual clingy romance, but then I remembered that thing you said about 'Experiments in Living.'"

"Yes!" I cheered. "Mill hated conformity. He thought society tries to force us all into one box, but we should be free to design our own lives. Maybe your happiness isn't the escalator of Date-Marry-Kids-Die. Maybe it's something you invent."

Mohan isn't "fixed." He’s still single, mostly. But the frantic swiping has stopped. He deleted the apps that made him feel like a satisfied pig. He texted Priya an apology (she left him on read, which he admitted was fair justice). 

He is, for the first time in years, a little lonely. He is Socrates, dissatisfied. And he’s never been happier.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Relativity of a Masterpiece: Why Interstellar Demands to Be Watched at Every Age 🕰️🚀

When a truly great film comes along, it doesn't just ask you to watch it; it asks you to live with it. Christopher Nolan’s  Interstellar  is that kind of masterpiece. I have revisited it many times, and with every year that passes and every new perspective I gain in life, the movie completely changes its meaning. It’s not one film, but a collection of evolving truths, each unlocked at a different age. To understand the film's full genius, you must watch it as an adolescent, a young adult, a hopeful father, and maybe one day, as a person reflecting on their entire life's legacy. The first time I saw it, I was  28 years old . The film had just been released. I was focused on starting a career, building my own life, and figuring out the messy business of adult relationships. Back then, the great mission to save humanity was the main attraction. My focus was not on the family drama, but on the  unrelenting spirit of human exploration . I saw Cooper as a hero breaking fre...

Calamity, Connection, and the Unpredictable Gift of Life

The recent tragedy of  Air India Flight 171 , crashing into the B.J. Medical College hostel complex in Ahmedabad and claiming over 270 lives, serves as a stark and painful reminder of the profound truth that it often takes a calamity to truly appreciate our blessings. For those of us far removed from the immediate impact, the news of such a devastating event can pierce through our everyday preoccupations, softening our ego and quietening the bitterness that sometimes simmers within. In the routine of our lives, we often take for granted the very fabric of our existence: the safety of a journey, the warmth of a home, the presence of loved ones, the simple act of breathing without pain. We might get caught up in petty grievances, career frustrations, or material desires, allowing these concerns to overshadow the immense fortune we possess. When Life's Fragility Hits Home Then, a tragedy like AI171 strikes. We see the images of the wreckage and hear the heart-wrenching stories of live...

Try Yourself

  If you went to a CBSE school , you probably remember the " Golden Guide " books. Back in 1999, this book was our lifeline for Math. It was basically a cheat sheet. It had all the likely questions and, best of all, the answers. It was a safety net. You didn't really have to struggle with a problem; you just had to look up the pattern. The guide had a specific system. It would solve two or three similar questions step-by-step. But to save space, or maybe to actually teach us something, the fourth question wouldn't have an answer. Instead, in bold letters, it just said:  "Try Yourself." I remember a funny unit test from those days involving one of my friends. He relied way too heavily on the Golden Guide. There was a question in the test that came straight from the book. Ironically, it was the exact question where the guide didn't give a solution. My friend trusted the book more than his own brain. He didn't solve the math. He didn't write a numbe...